Researching the Efficacy of the E4L Scanning System
“Of the subjects in the active group 96.5% experienced a positive change compared to 35% in the placebo group.”
“The study demonstrates the efficacy the Energy4Life scan, demonstrating that it was comparable to 3 energy measurement devices: PIP (polycontrast interference photography), GDV (gas discharge visualisation) and EIS (electro-interstitial scan).”
The Efficacy of Energy4Life scanning software as Determined by the Use of Three Comparative Energy Assessment Devices.
By Dr Thornton Streeter
This large scale (240 participant) comparative study was carried out by the Centre for Biofield Sciences in Pune , India, under the supervision of Dr. Thornton Streeter, a recognised expert in the field of energy medicine devices. The study was conducted after a successful pilot study involving 120 participants.